Comments on: Parallel processing Rip Van Winkle just woke up! http://www.appistry.com/blog/2007/08/parallel-processing-rip-van-winkle-just-woke/ News and Ideas from Appistry on Appistry, Cloud Computing, Private Clouds and More Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:37:17 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Idetrorce http://www.appistry.com/blog/2007/08/parallel-processing-rip-van-winkle-just-woke/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Idetrorce Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-30 very interesting, but I don't agree with you Idetrorce very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce

]]> By: Marcel Feenstra http://www.appistry.com/blog/2007/08/parallel-processing-rip-van-winkle-just-woke/comment-page-1/#comment-63 Marcel Feenstra Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-63 I'm interested in "massively parallel processing" --using hundreds of computers, each with multiple cores, as quickly as possible. I have found some information on PLINQ (Parallel LINQ); however, as I understand it, that's only for multi-core programming, not *distributed* programming, correct? Is there an "easy" way to combine both techniques, so that you can use as many cores on as many PCs as you have available, in a "transparent" fashion? I’m interested in “massively parallel processing” –using hundreds of computers, each with multiple cores, as quickly as possible.

I have found some information on PLINQ (Parallel LINQ); however, as I understand it, that’s only for multi-core programming, not *distributed* programming, correct?

Is there an “easy” way to combine both techniques, so that you can use as many cores on as many PCs as you have available, in a “transparent” fashion?

]]>