<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: Failure is OK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/</link>
	<description>News and Ideas from Appistry on Appistry, Cloud Computing, Private Clouds and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:47:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40</guid>
		<description>For the record, saying that the press surrounding the downtimes was a plus was a joke. Downtime is never good, and you should do everything you can to avoid it. However, it&#039;s a misrepresentation to say that you can build something successful without any downtime.

Telephones weren&#039;t reliable until the mid 90s. When Bell made the first telephone call, the concept of laying undersea cables and building global digital switching infrastructure was not only ridiculous (people thought the phone was a dumb idea), but impossible. The success was in trying, not in scaling.

I&#039;m not trying to say that scaling Twitter is impossible. Far from it, scaling Twitter is my day job. However, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a service that makes it easier to find friends for coffee, or find the shortest line for SXSW parties, was a ridiculous idea two years ago. I still get questions about the financial viability of it. Scaling is a commitment, and one you should only make once you&#039;re sure about an idea.

I&#039;ve made no bones about our mistakes. We haven&#039;t done the job as well as we should have. However, at no point were the problems strictly technical in nature, and as Eran is writing over on his blog ( http://www.hueniverse.com/ ) the issues are much more subtle than you&#039;d think.

I hope that clarifies the comments as recorded. Our foremost concern has been and will continue to be ensuring a stable platform; we&#039;ve been working hard on numerous fronts, and that work is paying off. Bad press is horrible, and I&#039;ll be the first to take pleasure in never again seeing a &quot;can Twitter scale?&quot; story, because I think we&#039;ve built something valuable and amazing that deserves to scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, saying that the press surrounding the downtimes was a plus was a joke. Downtime is never good, and you should do everything you can to avoid it. However, it&#8217;s a misrepresentation to say that you can build something successful without any downtime.</p>
<p>Telephones weren&#8217;t reliable until the mid 90s. When Bell made the first telephone call, the concept of laying undersea cables and building global digital switching infrastructure was not only ridiculous (people thought the phone was a dumb idea), but impossible. The success was in trying, not in scaling.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to say that scaling Twitter is impossible. Far from it, scaling Twitter is my day job. However, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a service that makes it easier to find friends for coffee, or find the shortest line for SXSW parties, was a ridiculous idea two years ago. I still get questions about the financial viability of it. Scaling is a commitment, and one you should only make once you&#8217;re sure about an idea.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made no bones about our mistakes. We haven&#8217;t done the job as well as we should have. However, at no point were the problems strictly technical in nature, and as Eran is writing over on his blog ( <a href="http://www.hueniverse.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hueniverse.com/</a> ) the issues are much more subtle than you&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>I hope that clarifies the comments as recorded. Our foremost concern has been and will continue to be ensuring a stable platform; we&#8217;ve been working hard on numerous fronts, and that work is paying off. Bad press is horrible, and I&#8217;ll be the first to take pleasure in never again seeing a &#8220;can Twitter scale?&#8221; story, because I think we&#8217;ve built something valuable and amazing that deserves to scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Ziv</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Ziv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Small correction: the panel was not organized by Blaine, but by Jakob Heuser (also one of the panelists) from Gaia Online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small correction: the panel was not organized by Blaine, but by Jakob Heuser (also one of the panelists) from Gaia Online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dormando</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>dormando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-42</guid>
		<description>jakob was the organizer ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jakob was the organizer <img src='http://www.appistry.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43</guid>
		<description>@Karen Ziv, dormando: thanks for the correction as to the panel organizer. my bad.

@Blaine: thanks for the thoughtful reply. I&#039;ll put up a follow-up post today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karen Ziv, dormando: thanks for the correction as to the panel organizer. my bad.</p>
<p>@Blaine: thanks for the thoughtful reply. I&#8217;ll put up a follow-up post today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eran Hammer-Lahav</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Eran Hammer-Lahav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47</guid>
		<description>The post Blaine mentioned is http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/03/on-scaling-a-mi.html


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post Blaine mentioned is <a href="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/03/on-scaling-a-mi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/03/on-scaling-a-mi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack T.</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/03/twitter-failure-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the URL to the post :)

&lt;div id=&quot;articlefor&quot; style=&quot;display: none&quot;&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Viagra for Geeks&lt;/h1&gt;
Geeks can use &lt;strong&gt;Viagra&lt;/strong&gt; the same way other people use it. Buying &lt;a title=&quot;Where and How to Buy Viagra Online?&quot; href=&quot;http://medicineworld.easy-url.org/buy-viagra-cialis/&quot;&gt;Viagra&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a title=&quot;order generic and brand Viagra online&quot; href=&quot;http://amax.easy-url.org/viagra/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt; can be &lt;a title=&quot;is it safe to buy Viagra and Cialis online?&quot; href=&quot;http://cools.easy-url.org/viagra-info/&quot;&gt;safe&lt;/a&gt; and affordable.
Viagra and Cialis together can be a great solution for an erection pack.
Viagra with its generic versions can beat any other erectile dysfunction drug.
Online pharmacies selling Viagra for $9 a pill require a prescription but not for generic medications, which are not approved by the FDA.
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the URL to the post <img src='http://www.appistry.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="articlefor" style="display: none">
<h1>Viagra for Geeks</h1>
<p>Geeks can use <strong>Viagra</strong> the same way other people use it. Buying <a title="Where and How to Buy Viagra Online?" href="http://medicineworld.easy-url.org/buy-viagra-cialis/">Viagra</a> <a title="order generic and brand Viagra online" href="http://amax.easy-url.org/viagra/">online</a> can be <a title="is it safe to buy Viagra and Cialis online?" href="http://cools.easy-url.org/viagra-info/">safe</a> and affordable.<br />
Viagra and Cialis together can be a great solution for an erection pack.<br />
Viagra with its generic versions can beat any other erectile dysfunction drug.<br />
Online pharmacies selling Viagra for $9 a pill require a prescription but not for generic medications, which are not approved by the FDA.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
