<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Taxonomy: Applications, Platform, Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/12/cloud-taxonomy-applications-platform-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/12/cloud-taxonomy-applications-platform-infrastructure/</link>
	<description>News and Ideas from Appistry on Appistry, Cloud Computing, Private Clouds and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:37:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane Brauner</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/12/cloud-taxonomy-applications-platform-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Brauner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Hi Sam,

Great summary of the three layers.  This is very much how we at 10gen see things shaping up as well.

One key component that I see us being able to leverage as Platform providers is interoperability.  Do you see an advantage to developing standards for platform / multi layer engagement?

Regards,
Shane
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam,</p>
<p>Great summary of the three layers.  This is very much how we at 10gen see things shaping up as well.</p>
<p>One key component that I see us being able to leverage as Platform providers is interoperability.  Do you see an advantage to developing standards for platform / multi layer engagement?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blog/2008/12/cloud-taxonomy-applications-platform-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-83</guid>
		<description>At PubCon in Las Vegas and I sat on a panel with Mike Culver from Amazon Web Services and had the opportunity to present on the topic of Cloud Computing from the perspective of my employer—SmarterTools, an independent developer of Web-based applications.    My take was to separate truth from hype.

The feedback was overwhelming!  So much so that we followed it up with an article and a copy of the presentation:
http://www.smartertools.com/blog/archive/2008/11/20/cloud-computing-challenges-benefits-and-the-future.aspx

As Cloud Computing gains buzz, it is important for us to remember what it really is and—perhaps more importantly—what it really isn’t.

Be well,
Jeffrey J. Hardy
http://www.smartertools.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At PubCon in Las Vegas and I sat on a panel with Mike Culver from Amazon Web Services and had the opportunity to present on the topic of Cloud Computing from the perspective of my employer—SmarterTools, an independent developer of Web-based applications.    My take was to separate truth from hype.</p>
<p>The feedback was overwhelming!  So much so that we followed it up with an article and a copy of the presentation:<br />
<a href="http://www.smartertools.com/blog/archive/2008/11/20/cloud-computing-challenges-benefits-and-the-future.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartertools.com/blog/archive/2008/11/20/cloud-computing-challenges-benefits-and-the-future.aspx</a></p>
<p>As Cloud Computing gains buzz, it is important for us to remember what it really is and—perhaps more importantly—what it really isn’t.</p>
<p>Be well,<br />
Jeffrey J. Hardy<br />
<a href="http://www.smartertools.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartertools.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
