Okay, maybe that was a bit harsh ;-)

Good points all. I've had a few people voice their concerns that not providing source means you can't inspect a service provider and be sure you're complying with things -- which seems legit, but makes me wonder if we need a way to prove that in fact what they showed you is what they're running.

I do think that we're going to see a switch from the Open Source torch to two new ones, however: Data portability and Open Services.

In the former case, it's going to be a question of whether I can move my data, metadata, and even business logic from one provider to another (say, Salesforce to SugarCRM.)

In the latter, it's going to be a question of whether there's a level playing field for services. Put another way, StarOffice/OpenOffice keeps Microsoft (relatively) honest; there's a price point at which people would simply switch to something cheaper and nearly as good. But there's no equivalent for services such as mapping, currency conversion, and so on. So I suspect we'll see a movement of open services to try and keep the playing field relatively level.

Thanks for the feedback!

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.