<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That depends on what the definition of Grid is</title>
	<link>http://www.appistry.com/blogs/jasen/reliability/that-depends-on-what-the-definition-of-grid-is/</link>
	<description>Jasen’s thought stream on Java, software architecture, application fabrics and other geeky topics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Herrick</title>
		<link>http://www.appistry.com/blogs/jasen/reliability/that-depends-on-what-the-definition-of-grid-is/#comment-50</link>
		<author>Mike Herrick</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 13:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.appistry.com/blogs/jasen/reliability/that-depends-on-what-the-definition-of-grid-is/#comment-50</guid>
					<description>I'm not so sure on virtualized grid. It is tough because as you mentioned and Nikita outlines, there are many flavors of grid. And there have been more than a few failures with more traditional hardware like grids. The problem (perhaps) with using the word "virtualized" is that there is also a virtualization craze on - and from my limited knowledge of your product, you don't having anything to do with it (certainly can run on it). 

I have also seen the term "application grid". Not sure I like that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure on virtualized grid. It is tough because as you mentioned and Nikita outlines, there are many flavors of grid. And there have been more than a few failures with more traditional hardware like grids. The problem (perhaps) with using the word &#8220;virtualized&#8221; is that there is also a virtualization craze on - and from my limited knowledge of your product, you don&#8217;t having anything to do with it (certainly can run on it). </p>
<p>I have also seen the term &#8220;application grid&#8221;. Not sure I like that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
